tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post5924240074152422074..comments2024-01-03T07:13:06.021+02:00Comments on Sailfish OS Reviews: Opinion on Sailfish OS 2.0 user experienceSimo Ruohohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01966088975774834718noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-62363941130852672402015-10-07T15:32:55.826+03:002015-10-07T15:32:55.826+03:00Auto hiding bar might be niceAuto hiding bar might be niceSimo Ruohohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01966088975774834718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-32218006095559675872015-10-07T13:40:52.373+03:002015-10-07T13:40:52.373+03:00I don't really think the point is about habits...I don't really think the point is about habits, otherwise I would not have gone for Sailfish OS (or MeeGo, in the first istance) :) <br /><br />TVs are media consumption devices, so you want to maximize your screen real estate (it's the same principle as putting a video in full screen mode), that's why I have no clock on my old TV neither - but channels do show a logo because it'sAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400458394204332239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-76707425446915929062015-10-06T22:31:22.903+03:002015-10-06T22:31:22.903+03:00>why should I perform a swipe to check the time...>why should I perform a swipe to check the time or wifi coverage?) <br /><br />Why do you permanently need to see those? Habit? My satellite TV does not permanently show signal strength (or time). My laptop doesn't show Wi-Fi signal strength permanently, my TomTom GPS satnav doesn't show satellite signal strength permanently.<br /><br />A large percentage of the time your phone is in aAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-22497047875903991372015-10-05T23:39:31.490+03:002015-10-05T23:39:31.490+03:00On the mock up at the MWC15 ambiences were marked ...On the mock up at the MWC15 ambiences were marked with a timer, let's see if this feature is about to come in the following 2.0 updates.<br /><br />Well, there are taps on other areas of SFOS, I cannot see how this would interfere with his paradigm. Sure, swipe on covers was handy, but I'm happy to get rid of it if I can have the current carousel in its place.<br /><br />Don't you Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400458394204332239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-27732647934590822912015-10-05T20:42:10.659+03:002015-10-05T20:42:10.659+03:00>ambences have a lot of potential
As they have ...>ambences have a lot of potential<br />As they have done for 2 years. And yet remain unrealised.<br /><br />>on other OS is not a source of mis-taps ... why should it be an issue on SFOS?<br />Because fundamentally SFOS was designed with a different paradigm.<br /><br />>if statusbar works everywhere else there must be a reason.<br />There used to be a lot of plague around; that doesn&#Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1725836381115371164.post-13983769611903386482015-10-05T17:43:31.331+03:002015-10-05T17:43:31.331+03:00I like it because it's not a simple rant but i...I like it because it's not a simple rant but it touches different points in a pretty deep way - but I don't agree with everything:<br /><br />1) The SFOS2 lockscreen has a different logic in the UX; instead of being part of the flow is an additional layer on top of the UI, this would eventually enable returning to the last opened app before locking the screen (feature in the pipeline, Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400458394204332239noreply@blogger.com